On the shores of the Timor Sea
on a dune of flowery white sand
in a hermitage
cobbled from corrugated sheet
whitewashed
walls guyed with cables against the wind
above the roof, a cross
made from broken oar lashed together
black rubber flippers, snorkel, mask
swimming for hours along the reef
with the shark
every evening at the typewriter
letters to friends all over the world
a long correspondence
with a Zen Buddhist monk
in Japan
then, the lamp
reading into the night
seven years
~Bruce Chatwin, from The Songlines; adapted by Philip Harnden in Journeys of Simplicity.
on a dune of flowery white sand
in a hermitage
cobbled from corrugated sheet
whitewashed
walls guyed with cables against the wind
above the roof, a cross
made from broken oar lashed together
black rubber flippers, snorkel, mask
swimming for hours along the reef
with the shark
every evening at the typewriter
letters to friends all over the world
a long correspondence
with a Zen Buddhist monk
in Japan
then, the lamp
reading into the night
seven years
~Bruce Chatwin, from The Songlines; adapted by Philip Harnden in Journeys of Simplicity.

Oh, this is so very beautiful.
ReplyDeleteDo you think the various people who've made these journeys care about responsibility? I'm not talking about the kind of responsibility that forces you to stay in a job you hate or the pressure to keep up appearances or to have more children or not have more children, etc...
ReplyDeleteI'm talking about human responsibility to our fellow earth-dwellers. Being a hermit sometimes sounds great to me too, but I wouldn't be able to "enjoy" or have Peace with it because I think I would feel extremely selfish. I couldn't do it for an extended period of time, at least. Although, I do acknowledge that everyone needs a retreat now again to replenish the well ---
I'm just thinking about all the folks in need... Don't we have a moral responsibility to help more than just ourselves?
Writing letters for 7 years? That seems like a neurotic selfish waste of intellectual resources...
I'm all for getting back to the simpler life...getting back to nature...getting back to our truest sense of self... but I think if it takes somebody 7 years, well, that's just too damn long.
Oh, and I forgot to give at least a little : )
ReplyDeleteAnd one more thing...
ReplyDeleteSometimes I think all this blog reading/writing is fabulous. Other times I feel like many of us spend all this time "bettering" ourselves, researching, thinking, delving into our deepest spiritual and soulful desires when, in reality, shouldn't we just be out there doing? Something? Anything?
Wilsonian,
ReplyDeleteGlad you liked it. :)
Val,
First, thank you for taking the time to leave this meaty comment; I appreciate it very much. Second, I don't have an answer to your question here, at least not one that I think would be satisfactory to you. You touch on the age old tension between the active and the contemplative. Whole books have been written about it.
It is very evident that you see the world through activist eyes. It should be evident to you by now in reading this blog that I tend to see the world through contemplative eyes. That of course does not mean that you can't appreciate the contemplative, nor does it mean that I never engage in activism. Nothing is that simple and cut and dried, eh?
I won't make a judgment as to which way of approaching the world is better or "right" or "wrong." I really don't think it's a question of that. However, I'll make no apologies for who I am...and that is what you see in this blog.
Peace to you.
I hope you know I smiled when I read your response. A little meaty debate first thing in the morning is a good way to start off the day...
ReplyDeleteAnd, by the way, if you ever made any apologies for who you are, then I would stop reading your blog. I read it for many reasons, but probably the most important reason is that you are honest about who you are and what you think.
P&L backatcha!
Val, apparently I wrote the comment above while you were writing your next two comments, so it addresses only your first comment. I'll address this one at your third comment.
ReplyDeleteAgain, I do not offer a defense. I make no claims that what I post here is all that need be said about anything. These are just snapshots, sound bites.... They may say one thing that is true in one circumstance. I'm not claiming answers.
I guess I'll just say that nobody is making anybody blog and nobody is stopping anybody from doing what they feel needs to be done.
And I am who I am. :)
And you are who you are. :)
And peace again.
We are playing comment tag...or something like that. :)
ReplyDeleteI keep smiling. It's like instant messaging but without knowing what the other person is writing first...
ReplyDeleteHey, all that matters is that you and I both know we're on the same wavelength. That's cool enough in and of itself.
Ah, I’d forgotten anything of this from Songlines. Neither do I know Philip Harnden…though I’ll rectify that ASAP via library or bookstore. He’s certainly made this sketch lovely by his arrangement.
ReplyDeleteI also found the comments from Val, and your answers to them, to be most interesting. I think about this dichotomy often—the active and the contemplative. I struggle with both. In the end, I suspect action ought to be the primary response—after all, if your house catches on fire, you want the doers to show up rather than the thinkers. And so many of the world’s ills need doers to set them right.
But…and it’s this may well be my personal downfall…I tend toward wanting to know the whys and wherefores of things, the reasons, justifications, history, and if possible, future. I approach most things this way, from spiritual to literary and creative arts, relationships, cooking and rambling outdoors. Yet sometimes I feel I’m fiddling while Rome burns.
What is the right role? What is our role? Conundrum? Conflict? See…there I go, thinking again. ☺
Thanks Grizzled. Your comments are always pertinent and thought provoking.
ReplyDeleteThe original intention of this posting was not to advance and argument for contemplation over action. Actually, it wasn't to advance any argument at all unless it be for simplicity. That was the intent.... The active versus contemplative argument is one I just don't do.
Peace
One last thing (because I apparently have very little self-control at the keyboard today) just to clarify where my head was/is...
ReplyDeleteI actually loved this piece. I was moved by every line. Until the last, that is. There was just something about the "seven years" part that made me jump out of my seat. I literally said out loud, "seven years!?".
For some reason it got my goat, and obviously started/startled something inside of me.
Don't feel obligated to respond to this last thought. I've taken up way too much of both of our days with this! ; )
Val,
ReplyDeleteHave you ever met any monks? I've spent a good deal of time with various sorts of them across the years. They've taught me more than anybody else in my life probably. Well, maybe that's my problem. ;)
Perhaps a talk with one of them about this might clear a thing up or two. Or maybe it would just get your goat. ;)
Peace
I suspect if those monks were to respond, it would be to say that if contemplation does not open you to the hurts of the world's people, you may be playing with narcissism. In one way or another, true contemplation leads one to live for others.
ReplyDeleteWell, those are MY thoughts anyway. You see, this post did not "go" where you thought it would "go" and neither does contemplation.
Barbara,
ReplyDeleteContemplation doesn't go where I think it does? And where did I say where I thought it went such that you would know where I think it goes? ;)
I actually don't disagree with what you're saying here. I was merely suggesting that Val talk to a monk to get some insight on contemplation.
Thanks and peace
I just meant that opening oneself as one does in contemplation often leads in unexpected directions. Writing a post does, too. At least in my own experience. ;)
ReplyDeleteI meant "you" in a generic way and not in a personal way. I should have used the word "one."
insight on contemplation:
ReplyDeleteThere is a way between voice and presence
where information flows
in disciplined silence, it opens
with wandering talk, it closes
~Jalal ad-Din Rumi
________________
I think often, as human beings, we miss flow-ways of communication that are very active in our lives... often, the "need to DO something" can interfere with ones listening, which itself would be doing a great deal more-
and I think we potentially could be more open to our relationship to time and distance, not taking it at "face value"- that is, at minds first measurement of what those things are...
I know the academics would get all up in arms over this one (you cannot prove a negative and all that) but as a pointer to what Rumi was speaking of in his poem, I would challenge to see some 'proof', that buddhist monks meditating in the Himalayas RIGHT NOW, are NOT in fact what is holding the world together for us...
I know, I know- its wrong... but its a pointer to something we dont commonly allow for...
Huh…we really did just sort of pick this whole post up and run off with it in a different direction!
ReplyDeleteAmazing.
Your codicil on stuff and who owns whom was right on. There is a wonderful beauty and marvelous freedom to be found in simplicity…especially as applied to our life. Life is not about stuff.
Barbara,
ReplyDeleteThank you for the clarification. :) I understand where you are coming from much better now. My humble apologies if I seemed a little testy in my reply.
Tom,
Welcome to the blog. Thanks for the visit and the comment. This academic is not put "all up in arms" by your comment here at all. Rather, I would say, "Well said." Thank you for offering this perspective on the matter.
Grizzled,
Thank you again. :)
Holy contemplation Batman!We flew the batmobile way off the deep end on this one.
ReplyDeleteSometimes we all take ourselves a little too seriously, no?
With a big ; ) and : )!!
Val, I'll say a hearty yes in agreement to that! :)
ReplyDeleteNow, wait a minute there...
ReplyDeletejust because ONE new-guy shows up, with a poem and some mystical who-ha, that means we get to pull out the "too serious" card? already??
I say we figure out which one's the new-guy and tell him to shove off, if hes going to make things all "serious" and all...
geesh!
*wink*
Tom,
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you showed up. And you can be as serious as you want to be here. I truly did appreciate your comment and agreed with it too. :)
I should have been a little more clear with my response to Val's last comment and said that I know that I take myself a little too seriously sometimes. :)
Peace
PS And yes, I know you that with your comment there you were joining in the general lightening things up. :)
ReplyDeleteThe Berry quote in your sidebar is particularly apt :)
ReplyDeleteOne of my favorite dialogues ever!
ReplyDelete