"Go quietly, Carry little."

Poetry, quotations, personal reflections from a lover of the wilderness, a lover of the silence....


Friday, January 16, 2009

Deep Ecology

I posted yesterday on the passing of the philosopher of Deep Ecology, Arne Naess. Today, I would like to share with you the basic tenets of Deep Ecology. I think they are worthy of consideration, and more sorely needing to be heeded now than when Naess and his colleague George Sessions first developed them in 1984.

1) The well-being and flourishing of human and nonhuman life on Earth have value in themselves (synonyms: inherent worth; intrinsic value; inherent value). These values are independent of the usefulness of the nonhuman world for human purposes.

2) Richness and diversity of life forms contribute to the realization of these values and are also values in themselves.

3) Humans have no right to reduce this richness and diversity except to satisfy vital needs.

4) Present human interference with the nonhuman world is excessive, and the situation is rapidly worsening.

5) The flourishing of human life and cultures is compatible with a substantial decrease of the human population. The flourishing of nonhuman life requires such a decrease.

6) Policies must therefore be changed. The changes in policies affect basic economic, technological structures. The resulting state of affairs will be deeply different from the present.

7) The ideological change is mainly that of appreciating life quality (dwelling in situations of inherent worth) rather than adhering to an increasingly higher standard of living. There will be a profound awareness of the difference between big and great.

8) Those who subscribe to the foregoing points have an obligation directly or indirectly to participate in the attempt to implement the necessary changes.

Source: Devall & Sessions, Deep Ecology via Sister Earth.

9 comments:

  1. Forest…

    I guess I don't understand, exactly, where Naess would have this lead.

    Most of his values are noble, but if, as I think he may be, calling for limited reproduction or some such measure to decrease the human population, then I'm less inclined to accept and agree. Not because what he says re. human overpopulation interfering with non-human life isn't true, but because he sees policies and policy making as a means to such change. Regulation rather than responsibility.

    The term "life quality" is also something I fear.

    Anyway, that's my take, for what it worth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As always, thanks for the comment, Grizzled. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. On a tangent here - I've been reading some of your old posts and particularly enjoyed reading the poem "Forget Everything"..."If someone says....have dinner and go to bed".
    I smiled to myself as I regularly enjoy doing this...when people tell me that at new year I must stay up and engage in loud and over-consuming ways, I do the opposite...have dinner and go to bed early.

    I'm enjoying reading both your blog and SW's blog.

    Thanks
    Bella

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bella, tangent welcomed. :)

    Good for you on your new year's "definace," if I may call it that....

    I am humbled and honored that you enjoy my blog. SW's is definitely a winner.

    Peace to you Bella. Thank you for being here.

    PS Do you have a blog?

    ReplyDelete
  5. no blog for me...I have thought about it but not sure what angle or theme (too many ideas)...I have always collected quotes, writings and poems and if I did venture into blogging it probably would be to consolidate these ideas and thoughts I have collected.
    But both your blog and SW's blog have similar threads to what I like
    - so I'm happy reading :)

    Bella

    ReplyDelete
  6. For me, deep ecology goes hand-in-hand with Taoist thought. We Homo Sapiens seem to be so full of ourselves -- like we're the zenith of all creation.

    We're just one of billions of different organisms and all of these life forms are connected. It is, therefore, our responsibility to lead lives that nourish the tapestry of life, not destroy it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bella,
    Fair enough. If you ever decide to start that blog, let us know. :)

    RT,
    I couldn't agree with you more.

    Thanks all. Peace.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey, Bella, the best New Year's Eve I ever had was in Rome when we didn't have to do "what was expected of us" - we ate fish and "good luck" beans at midnight, kissed all the Italians in the restaurant, then walked through freezing streets under a starry sky to our modest lodgings and went to bed. Fantastic!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sounds like a great New Years to me, SW! :)

    ReplyDelete